Choosing a Trustee
When choosing a Trustee, individuals often look to family members or friends. There are many reasons for this. They are the ones who know what the grantor wants. Also, they will probably not charge for their services.
Do they have the right skills? It is not a bargain to appoint a family member or friend because they will not charge, if they create a mess when handling the trust.
Even if they are skilled, are they the right person? Will it cause resentments with other family members? Do they have a conflict of interest? If the trust’s primary intent is to care for the current beneficiaries (children?), and then distribute the remaining residue to beneficiaries of whom the Trustee is one, will he/she knowingly or unconsciously refuse to make reasonable distributions to preserve money?
Or, alternatively, will the family member be too nice? Will they be able to stand up to the pressure of the primary beneficiaries’ requests for funds?
It can work best when there is only one child. If he/she is the Trustee, it makes the most sense.
If there are multiple siblings, naming them as co-trustees can work, if they can work together. If not, it can be a mess. It can become unworkable.
For these reasons, Grantors will often name a Corporate Trustee (bank or Trust Company) to administer the trust.
The downsides are the fiduciary fees that they charge and their tendency to be conservative when it comes to investments.
The upsides are many. The Corporate Trustee will easily handle unreasonable beneficiaries. They will also go on forever so there is no concern with the Trustee dying.
There is no “right” answer for choosing a Trustee. Family dynamics and finances may direct the choice. It is important for the Grantor to consider all of these issues without automatically defaulting to the oldest son or daughter.